Posted by: ipswichspy | January 19, 2012

Council limits rent rises to inflation

Ipswich Borough Council is proposing to keep a rise in council house rents to inflation from April this year, according to a report being presented to a council meeting next week, rejecting proposals to push rents up by 7.2% as part of Government guidelines to achieve rent convergence by 2015/16.

Ipswich Spy understands this decision was proposed, in part, because the council recognises that many tenants are facing very difficult financial times and a large increase would add to the hardship being caused by Government cuts.

David Ellesmere told Ipswich Spy:

“Everyone is feeling the pinch at the moment and we felt that the Government guideline rent increase of 7.2% would have placed too much of a burden on our tenants. However the Government still has a stated desire for “rent convergence” with Housing Associations. So there is a risk that having a lower-than-inflation rent rise would lead to a big Government-imposed “catch-up” increase in future years.

“This real-terms freeze in rents will still allow us to keep the “Ipswich Standard” of housing maintenance and to move forward on our plans to build the first new council houses in Ipswich for over 20 years”

Normally the housing rents would be considered as part of the Medium Term Financial plan, the council’s budget process, but because of the statutory need to inform residents before 5th March 2012 the council is holding a special council meeting next Wednesday. This also means, because of ongoing changes to council housing finance, it has been impossible to consult with tenants representatives. The council will be putting a 30 year business plan for the Housing Revenue Account to the February council meeting.

The lack of consultation raised the ire of Ipswich Liberal Democrat Chairman Cllr Ken Bates, who said it was not true that the council was unable to consult with tenants representatives:

“It is always possible to contact tenant representatives directly, though since the administration has abolished the Housing Management Board, it’s been made more difficult for tenants to have a say. Labour, it would appear, are removing tenant consultation piece by piece.”

Cllr Bates also expressed shock at the size of the rise, which, at 5.6%, was the rate of inflation last September.

“Labour are not only potentially putting essential community groups out of business, they are hitting Ipswich Borough Homes tenants with an over inflated increase that will take more money out of some of the vulnerable members of our communitys’ pocket.”

IS/NC

Advertisement

Responses

  1. Ken, the lack of consultation is not important really as even when there were opportunities to discuss issues at forums no notice was taken of what the public said. It did however allow the council to claim consultation had taken place which I believe may have been a requirement. If folks boycott Russell Road based meetings it maybe possible to claim there is no consultation at all.

  2. “Real-terms freeze in rents”? I don’t think so! Have people’s wages or benefits increased that much? Not sure about that, Cllr Ellesmere. 7.2% was too much, but 5.6% is acceptable? The excuses about a lack of tenant representative involvement is absolutely ridiculous!

    • Benefits will be uplifted by 5.6% in April. The Government uses the RPI rate from September, just as the council have. From next year the Government will use CPI which is lower.

      • Not all social housing tenants are on benefits!

      • isn’t the purpose of rent convergence to bring all social housing (RSL & council) in line so that similar houses are the same cost? Didn’t think the private sector came into it Ken.

      • Are working people seeing a pay rise of 5.6%?

      • Not likely! That’s why those on benefits cause so much rancour amongst the workers!

  3. Ken Bates – YOUR Government wants Councils to put up rent by 7.2% – instead of having a go at the Labour run council you shhould be talking to your Party leader – Mr Clegg

    • Alasdair the rent convergence scheme was launched in 2001 by Lord Falconer, at that time Housing Minister in the Labour Government of Tony Blair. Hardly some new scheme dreamt up by the coalition.

  4. I understand that but how can Cllr Bates mean when we are setting rate lower than the Govt want? I would have expected the last coalition run IBC to have raised it to want their Govt wanted

    • Classic Ross. Have a go at us for something we didn’t do.

      • But all thse comments then Ken Bates and the Lib Dems voted with us for the rent rise? where does your party stand on this?

  5. Alasdair Ross – A Labour government started this whole process of bringing social housing rents in line with the private sector in the first place! Maybe you could explain why tenant reps weren’t consulted, as the excuse I’ve read is ridiculous!

    • Ken, if you agree with Ipswuich conservatives that this is so awful, why did all you Lib Dems vote for it?

  6. An inflation level rent increase would seem reasonable in the current financial environment, but given the very recent national revelations regarding the illegal sub-letting of council properties, this Ipswich council tax-payer would like assurance regarding the local rates of this scam and what our representatives are doing to confront and eliminate it. I do not mind subsidising the genuinely needy but not the genuinely greedy.

  7. As was also pointed out at Full Council – the rise is less than the amount imposed by the Tory/Lib Dem administration last year

  8. [...] Also on Ipswich Spy here [...]


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Categories

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 474 other followers