Rent increases for community and voluntary groups
Recap and update:
On 10th January this year the Executive of Ipswich Borough Council discussed a report headed “Rent Discounts to Voluntary and Community Organisations”.
This Orwellian title was probably chosen to disguise the fact that the Council’s intention was, in fact, to greatly increase community rents.
The basic proposals were a) to charge the full market rent on the properties currently used by these organisations b) to offer a discount on this and c) to put in place transitional arrangements to lessen the impact of these large increases.
The council’s original report recommended a 50% discount, but revised recommendations on the night saw an 80% discount proposed (referred to as Option One in the report.) This may seem a generous amount but because many of the current rents are peppercorn, the groups involved will see an increase of well over a thousand pounds and in some cases, much more. One of the worst hit will be ISCRE (Ipswich and Suffolk Council for Racial Equality); under Option One their rent could increase by £3,200 just at the point where they are already being hit by reduced funding.
The Council acknowledge (paragraph 4.2) that the provision of Council owned assets for use by voluntary and community organisations helps to ensure that the facilities are available to help facilitate community participation and that this contributes to the Transforming Ipswich priority, “Strengthening the Community” and yet they appear to be determined to push through rent increases that will most decidedly weaken community effort!
To add insult to injury the consultation letter sent out in the last few days states that the tenant shall be responsible for the landord’s legal costs. The Maidenhall Resident’s Association for instance has been told that they will have to pay approximately £250 AND “a fair proportion” of any building insurance that the council arranges (amount not stated)
The Council has proudly announced that no group will pay a rent increase in the first year because a grant will be given to cover any increase, but they have failed to mention that community groups would be stung for the legal costs of drawing up the new leases.
The affected groups now have until 10th February 2012 to respond and the matter will go back to the Executive on 13th March.
If you have been helped by groups like the Ipswich Furniture Project, ISCRE, Maidenhall Residents Association, Chantry Residents Association, Whitehouse Residents Association, the Waterfront Community Group etc then please write letters to the local Press and to the Council and make your feelings known at the new Area Committees: after all this is certainly a case where decision-making should be brought closer to the people.
Ipswich Community Radio (ICR) kindly gave me a chance to speak on their Breakfast Show yesterday, on this issue, so they are asking for comments too.
I’ll bet if you look at every single group affected, inclusive of legal fees, their costs to the council are rising.
Ipswich Labour. Incompetent or dishonest?
By: Cllr Andrew Cann on January 27, 2012
at 11:07 am
I agree: I personally cannot see a single community group that will benefit in any way from these changes; the council’s claim that in any new system there will be winners and losers simply doesn’t hold water here: every group will be a “loser” financially if these new leases are imposed.
However, in the interests of objectivity I would like to stress that I do not support any particular political group; over the last 10 years I have tabled Questions at the full Council meetings regardless of which party was the ruling one at the time.
By: Sally Wainman on January 27, 2012
at 12:46 pm
So far we’ve seen an increase in rents to all tenants of IBC. What’s next, a council tax increase, blaming the actions of our coalition Government?
By: Ken Bates on January 27, 2012
at 2:19 pm
Ken
You voted for rise for council tenants – slightly confused by your stance on here
By: A Ross on January 27, 2012
at 2:52 pm
So am I. One minute you don’t consult with tenants and give a lame excuse, then suddenly you have without specifying how that was done exactly and what their comments were…
By: Ken Bates on January 27, 2012
at 3:38 pm
But you still voted for rise?
By: A Ross on January 27, 2012
at 3:41 pm
The one you wanted.
By: Ken Bates on January 27, 2012
at 4:04 pm
If you do not agree with it- why did you vote for it?
By: A Ross on January 27, 2012
at 4:37 pm
Could you please comment on the community group rent rises as the housing tenancies are on a different article on here.
By: Sally Wainman on January 27, 2012
at 8:48 pm
Alasdair, when this matter was raised at the first Area Committee did you know then that the community groups would be asked to foot the legal bill for the new leases?
By: Sally Wainman on January 28, 2012
at 1:33 pm
Sally- we will do our best to help all groups- we are raisng our grant to ISCRE and the Ipswich Daisability Group after the Tory County Council and the Tory/Lib Dem Govt reduced grants – think you are attacking the wrong party
By: A Ross on January 28, 2012
at 8:28 pm
But you’re also increasing costs (be they rent and/or legal costs) to all these groups Alasdair. So you’re causing the pain. Can you tell me over the 4 years which group wins?
By: Cllr Andrew Cann on January 30, 2012
at 4:54 pm
[...] Ipswich Spy here Ken Bates said So far we’ve seen an increase in rents to all tenants of IBC. What’s next, a [...]
By: RSV Agrees with Alasdair Ross | A riverside view Blog on January 29, 2012
at 9:37 pm
[...] Ipswich Spy here Ken Bates said So far we’ve seen an increase in rents to all tenants of IBC. What’s next, a [...]
By: A riverside view Blog on February 3, 2012
at 5:16 pm
[...] Ipswich Spy here Ken Bates said So far we’ve seen an increase in rents to all tenants of IBC. What’s next, a [...]
By: Lib Dem Focus | A riverside view Blog on February 3, 2012
at 5:19 pm